Dr. Mike Yeadon — Aangirfan — another, fighting man.
Doing 'B.', not, 'C.', today.
The people who are calling for Britain to remain in the EU are either sell outs operating on behalf of the bankers, or the simple minded, enfeebled fools duped by these same bankers puppets.
If nothing else this process has served the purpose of accurately identifying a large proportion of the sell-outs and tools of globalism. Whatever happens do not forget who they are and if you value liberty and the truth never ever listen to anything they say on any issue of public policy. Ever.
The arguments in support of the remain campaign have plumbed the depths of depravity in their dishonesty and that is without bringing the Jo Cox psyop into consideration.
A realistic view of the UK would note that given that Britain is in possession of both nuclear weapons and a seat on the UN Security Council the idea that Britain’s security depends on the EU is akin to an April Fools joke.
: James Robertson, Crimesofempire.com, June 22nd, 2016.
Documentary Of The Decade:
[Other contenders? His, other documentaries.]
[No need to watch first, man's pure gangster, an OG-Statesman. One, of a...]
[...and, the name of Vaughan Harper's WBLS Show.]
A rational and logical approach to C-19, continues to reveal the persistence in lies and deception from the Govt. and co-opted, 'experts'. Journalists and presenters, grapple to find justification, or 'plausible deniability'? How to understand the Govt., is deceived, -over-, deceiving, —is a painful puzzle.
One friend who manages deeper and detailed discussions, has it that 'C-19', is all about, Brexit. The push to stop it and ever-delay, through emergency times and measures.
How genuine were the likes of Farage and Johnson? And can the UK 'exit' agreements and a legal framework, from the outset, designed to keep countries in their club?
How about the City of London wanting, out? With, Washington and elites, for, in? Contrived to allow, one 'elite lot', define the vision ahead?
Behind-them families and cult leaders; What do they want?
The 'battle to stop Brexit' is more, 'ends for the means'. Prolonging the persecution, while ensuring people precipitate, voluntarily, in their own, social breakdown.
Politicians in their TV partnership are bribed, blackmailed, and/or threatened. What else can explain their behaviour?
My theological theory, maintains the perpetrators and 'puppet masters', harvest something, from... the lies. Whatever the needs and desire, it's all about the TV presentation.
Plantaseed.org.uk/juicy-sugar-free, re-posted, Brabantian on Aangirfan and the 'six theories of covid-19 coronavirus, circulating in mass media and on the alternate web':
(1) Covid is real and natural like the Spanish flu a century ago, and capitalist governments such as Trump's, out of a combination of desire for business, plus incompetence, have let the virus spread, via negligent efforts to keep the economy going.
(2) Covid is real, and the Chinese are responsible for creating a bio-weapon that got loose and out of control.
(3) Covid is real, and the USA plus maybe Israel, are responsible for creating a bio-weapon launched against China and Iran, that got loose and out of control.
(4) Covid is real, a bio-weapon created to cull the elderly and sick, saving pension, disability and welfare funds for governments.
(5) Covid is a hoax, 'just the flu', a scam co-ordinated by world governments / deep states both east and west, to put in place a control grid staging an eventual NWO, blaming deaths on 'covid' when over 90% of 'covid deaths' are seriously ill or elderly people who are regularly killed off as the flu hits them, with constant false covid test results, hospitals and governments paid and bribed to diagnose 'covid', etc.
(6) Covid is a mixture of real and hoax, given that light dosages of chemical weapons such as sarin gas, will create similar symptoms such as respiratory system pseudo-pneumonia and collapse ... sarin gas perhaps being deployed in China, in Iran and Italy, followed by co-ordinated covid exaggerated claims by world governments as above.
Every cop’s ultimate goal is to make it to retirement (usually 20 years) with a comfortable pension, where he can start a second career. Every cop wants as little friction as possible.
Cops KNOW where the criminality is taking place, but do almost nothing to “solve the problems” as doing so puts them in real danger.
It’s easier to harass honest citizens during traffic stops than it is to go after REAL criminals who know “how the game is played”.
Cops who demand “respect” while abusing their “authority” IS a major problem in many departments.
The honest person who is (forcibly) involved with cops (traffic stop) is the easiest person to harass and even set up.
Boston cops were recently caught planting drugs on people in order to boost their “quota” requirements. Despite denials by officials and cops, “ticket quotas” are commonly used in almost every police department to assess “officer performance”.
Lucrative union “collective bargaining agreements” that shield “bad” cops from having their disciplinary records revealed or scrutinized, union lawyers who “cover up” misbehavior and cop-friendly prosecutors who always take the cop’s side are a major problem as well, although the release of “bad” cop records is starting to be recognized as a way to reign in “bad” cops.
Most of the present-day problems started with the expansion of “qualified immunity” in 1986, which absolved cops of wrongdoing for just about any misbehavior that they commit.
“I feahed fo’ mah life” is the standard police response in a questionable lethal use-of-force situation. It is almost always successful in the cop’s favor.
As ordinary citizens, we are told that “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, while court rulings specifically absolve cops of requiring them to have “knowledge of the law”. Double standard, indeed.
When a cop, having criminal intent, wanting to shoot someone, can shoot a citizen for being unable to crawl with his hands behind his back, be acquitted in court, despite full video evidence being presented, and to add insult to injury, be rehired in order to receive a pension, something is seriously wrong. (See Mesa Arizona cop Philip Brailsford murdering Daniel Shaver).
Finally, police are getting “blowback”, something that I feared would happen, and that I predicted would be the case decades ago. Cops are also being held back by their “chiefs of police” who are usually political appointees serving at the pleasure of city officials.
That being said, I have absolutely no use for the so-called “peaceful (yeah, right) protesters” who are hell-bent on destroying civil society, who are being egged on by “deep state” and city officials who are holding back cops from doing their jobs.
Street Fighting Man and Christopher Hitchens.
And, Peter Hitchens;
One of the problems with great music ( I think particularly of J.S. Bach) is that its power to lift the human heart can be abused, precisely because it is independent of literature and the human voice, and speaks directly to us without moderation. Therefore if the propagandist cunningly couples it to his message (especially in company with filmed images), it may reinforce that message. Bach wrote every note to the glory of God, and had no reason to expect that it would ever serve any other purpose. But other idealists, other utopians, can of course gain solace from its power. When I was a revolutionary socialist, I was particularly in love with Beethoven’s Third, Fifth and Seventh symphonies (the second movements, in each case, seemed the most sublime). I still am, but I understand them quite differently now. Because it bypasses words, such music can serve any purpose that matches the emotions it evokes. In any case, Beethoven was a political radical, and I may even have understood him better as a Trotskyist student than I do now as a reactionary columnist. Bach, because so much of his work is linked to choral works of Christian majesty, is harder to recruit to non-Christian causes.
Nor, obviously, is it impossible for someone to appreciate great music and to be a savage barbarian in other aspects of his life. Lenin loved Beethoven, and refused to listen to music lest it diverted him from his Utopian goal. National Socialist Germany retained a great deal of musical talent, and Hitler was, of course, obsessed with the works of Richard Wagner. Wagner , interestingly, was a sexual revolutionary and a radical.
As I might have expected, various wiseacres demand to know if there is anything I enjoy, and why I am so miserable etc etc. ‘Let’s have a smile, eh, Peter?’ they drivel, like aunts at a knees-up trying to ‘cheer up’ a small boy who would rather be reading a book. As it happens, I have been very fortunate in my private life, and have many personal pleasures (which I don’t propose to discuss ere, as they are nobody’s business but my own). But that does not stop me fearing for the future of my country, or being angry or distressed about aspects of British life, manners and morals.
: Peter Hitchens. Do Young People Really Hate Bach?