'...as seems to be the evidence from trial results to date'.
Which trial and what results?
To the Govt./s.
As Christian leaders across a range of denominations, we continue to pray at this time for your government “and all in high positions, so that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and dignity” (1 Timothy 2:2).
However, we write to you concerning an area of the most serious concern, namely the potential introduction into our society of so-called “vaccine passports” which have also been referred to as “COVID-status certificates” and “freedom passes”. We are wholly opposed to this suggestion and wish to make three points about the potential consideration of any scheme of this type.
Firstly, to make vaccination the basis of whether someone is allowed entry to a venue, or participation in an activity, makes no logical sense in terms of protecting others. If the vaccines are highly effective in preventing significant disease, as seems to be the evidence from trial results to date, then those who have been vaccinated have already received protection; there is no benefit to them of other people being vaccinated. Further, since vaccines do not prevent infection per se even a vaccinated person could in theory carry and potentially pass on the virus, so to decide someone’s “safe non-spreader” status on the basis of proof of their immunity to disease is spurious.
Secondly, the introduction of vaccine passports would constitute an unethical form of coercion and violation of the principle of informed consent. People may have various reasons for being unable or unwilling to receive vaccines currently available including, for some Christians, serious issues of conscience related to the ethics of vaccine manufacture or testing. We risk creating a two-tier society, a medical apartheid in which an underclass of people who decline vaccination are excluded from significant areas of public life. There is also a legitimate fear that this scheme would be the thin end of the wedge leading to a permanent state of affairs in which COVID vaccine status could be expanded to encompass other forms of medical treatment and perhaps even other criteria beyond that. This scheme has the potential to bring about the end of liberal democracy as we know it and to create a surveillance state in which the government uses technology to control certain aspects of citizens’ lives. As such, this constitutes one of the most dangerous policy proposals ever to be made in the history of British politics.
Finally, as Christian leaders we wish to state that we envisage no circumstances in which we could close our doors to those who do not have a vaccine passport, negative test certificate, or any other “proof of health”. For the Church of Jesus Christ to shut out those deemed by the state to be social undesirables would be anathema to us and a denial of the truth of the Gospel. The message we preach is given by God for all people and consists in nothing other than the free gift of grace offered in Christ Jesus, with the universal call to repentance and faith in him. To deny people entry to hear this life-giving message and to receive this life-giving ministry would be a fundamental betrayal of Christ and the Gospel. Sincere Christian churches and organisations could not do this, and as Christian leaders we would be compelled to resist any such Act of Parliament vigorously.
We draw your attention to the recent Judicial Review overturning the Scottish Government’s ban on public worship, which demonstrates that such disproportionate prevention of the right to worship is a clear infringement under Article 9 of the European Convention of Human Rights. We cannot see how any attempt to prevent people gathering for worship on the basis of either testing or non-vaccination would not similarly be ruled to be a breach. We agree with those members of Parliament who have already voiced opposition to this proposal: that it would be divisive, discriminatory and destructive to introduce any such mandatory health certification into British society. We call on the government to assert strongly and clearly that it will not contemplate this illiberal and dangerous plan, not now and not ever.
Case number is a garbage number because it is based on a completely flawed PCR test. The number is essentially meaningless.
Death numbers is a hard number that can be taken as true unless the relevant reporting authorities are outright lying.
Why the people died can only really determined by autopsy, and even then only the immediate cause can be known while the underlying cause cannot necessarily be known.
This is why we look for correlations between deaths and potential underlying causes. A surge in deaths after a vaccination campaign certainly points to the vaccine as being a possible underlying cause. To substantiate the possibility, one would have to do a complete compositional analysis of the vaccine and to determine whether any one or more of the compositional ingredients can give rise to the immediate causes of death. This can only be done if the toxicity profile of each of the ingredients is known, and whether there are any interactions between ingredients that can give rise to toxicity. If the toxicity profile of one or more of the ingredients is unknown, experiments would need to be done to determine that.
As can be seen, certainty is impossible without extensive testing. Since extensive testing has not been done, and will not be done, we are left with simple correlation and conjecture.
One can then see the scope for deception even though the correlation between the so-called vaccines and the deaths is compelling.
It's 100, and a twenty, and back some: unto the praying kind, likes of Praying Hyde. The Brainard’s, and like. Were, 'scum of the earth' yet..., 'the world was not worthy of them'?
The Acts Of The Apostles, still, unfinished.
That, lot, and for me/+ Bible says, are the HEADLINE'rs and make for central heart of God, inspire'rs.
Reply to Simon
The west has always been the most evil force on earth. Last nights idiocy in London for example, Betty alone face nappied up in a vast empty church bidding farewell to the leech of over 70 years while the west maunder on and on endlessly about ”vaccines” that are killing people, and in Australia our media carry on as if we have been over run when indeed nothing has happened at all. Reason has left the west as the rest of the world continue on their merry way, the west lie and maunder that 3 million have died of a non existent virus while in reality millions of babies are being systematically murdered by the west and their proxy killing machines.
Real vaccines, as the word’s etymology – Latin, vaccinus, from cows, the cowpox virus vaccine first used by British physician Edward Jenner in 1800 to prevent smallpox – involve the use of a small amount of a virus. The RNA inoculations are not vaccines. To say they are is bullshit and has nothing to do with cows. To call them vaccines is linguistic mind control.
What I ought, to do, is unpack the Progressive Evangelical, denial of the devil talk? Greg Boyd, puts in a stand for some sense. No one there, to state the holes in their case. The influence upon, say Walter Bruggerman; they celebrate, I mourn. Of all Prog. Christians thinking/theology, the removal of personality and free agents, considering the face value reading of Scripture..., is some, philosophical gymnastics? As with the C-19 Jab-a-wocky, there's a whole lotta minimising-the-importance, going on.
Let alone the theology am here/blogging to question and "Wakey Wakey Boys"? The testimony of the Pentecostal/Charismatic and last 50 years and about ALL that's happenin' in Christianity? It's "Forget That" and bundle-off into the silly, and eccentric, bin. Don't take it on as a serious study, or investigation? Goes along with no-talk(about) the 'Virus', that hasn't been isolated and sequenced?