Stands All They Can Stands And Can’t Stands No More
Aimin' to rap, on the rappers, and trapping, on Truthscoop. For now... PAS. Lush, ...later x.
June 18, 2021
GOT TO BE WRIT: Richard D. Hall, solidifies himself as the documentary maker of this generation. For me, y'can 'cross the pond and nah better? A story, "too hot" to handle and other takers; Relaxed but comprehensive; Unpretentious high-production values; An updated, 70s UK/ITV, investigative journalist, door-knocking and chasing the fox. Genuine corruption-busting with a human touch.
The evidence seems clear that yet another President was removed by the military/security complex. John F. Kennedy was shot. Nixon was removed by the Watergate frame up. The two attempts on Reagan—assassination and Iran-Contra–missed. After Russiagate and impeachment failed, Trump was taken out with a stolen election covered up with the “Trump Insurrection.”
President Carter could also have been a victim of the military-security complex. He was talked into the risky rescue of US embassy personnel held hostage by the Iranian revolution. The military managed to completely botch the rescue, and used the presstitutes to blame Carter.
Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan were the peace-minded presidents who worked for better relations with Russia (the Soviet Union as it was known at the time). Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama are the presidents who did the most to raise tensions with Russia. The military/security complex did not act against these three presidents.
An independent forensic investigation of the 2017 Manchester Arena "bombing" incident. 14,000 Ariana Grande fans had just finished watching a concert, when a loud bang was heard coming from the arena foyer. The vast majority of people did not witness an explosion because the foyer is a separate enclosure unsighted from the main arena. Immediately after the bang, crowds flooded out of the arena, some of them in panic. The mainstream media quickly reported that a suicide bomber had detonated a "nuts and bolts" bomb in the centre of the foyer, which they quickly claimed killed 22 people and injured dozens more. Despite the foyer being comprehensively covered by CCTV cameras, to date, no CCTV footage of the foyer area has been released for public scrutiny. Only 2 short pieces of video footage and one still photograph have surfaced showing the alleged aftermath within the foyer. Astonishingly, forensic examination of these videos and still image shows they were produced 15 hours before the time of the alleged explosion! Close scrutiny of first hand eye witness testimony and other evidence casts doubt on the official narrative and leads to the possibility that the event was a carefully stage managed exercise involving scores of enlisted participants. Richard D. Hall with help from two trusted researchers examines the evidence and builds a picture of what most likely occurred.
First, REWIND. No idea, Critical Thinker, has 'got into God'. The video was up for the Manchester Arena, Event(?). After ten minutes, already knocked over, and a premier introducing; How he came to understand, how the way the world works? Following is talk about... God. Double blessing, because earlier, chats, (...and, Big-Up to Strummer-B. and fam.), and a surprise-to-discover is a Christian. PAS regulars can guess my sensitivities/shock, keen lookout, and gagging to see. All in consideration, and the scarcity of credible sounding, believers?
Thinkin' about giving Critical Thinker, a shout, and my reaction?/ If... will post the note/NOT, seeking... fellowship/ or, correspondence, etc. Having listened through, grace enough, to direct what are the differences have come to understand, and... embrace. Grace, that knows the views we share, and the primary matters to be united in. Hope so.
If I was to offer a word, for him, and in light of the fresh and avoiding the religious-tones, the wibbly-wobbly, etc., and telling his story?
The ask and, why isn't, the Christian Church a-happenin'? A revealing, and thankful to hear, concern, and question. The rest of the discernment contains light, but comes from a 'futuristic view of biblical prophecy,' and a traditional view of homosexuality.
My repeated cry, is to hold our personal and/or Ch., Trad., views as a firm centre. While our convictions and visions, determine the strength, therein. Seeking though, to believe it's us like-minded Christians, ...are, Christians, and/or, on the acceptable list, to define, Evangelical?
The changes (can/ should?), come. The realisation, this is an immature stage. Out of babe's doing as the dad's, or mum's, say/do, or; Struggling and facing new perceptions, is fraught with adolescence-like, behaviour. The mode of the Heresy Hunters becomes the We Wrestle... and church spatting or presumed higher learning and practices.
The battle becomes about re-framing the church-in-totality, to accept the essentials and primary issues are drawn up by their specific streams of thinking. From a lineage of thinkers, depending on the particular Trads., jump-up time in Church history.
For the CT' sounding hard-core-ish end, the reckoning is that theirs is found/set/approved teaching. Fits a self-assessed, holy way, that dispenses with 'secondary issues'. Not for bothering with or take on and claim, 'wider-family'. Every jot 'n tittle is claimed' owned, and so prime and fixed. No time to concede and manage common ground to stand and contextualise our differences. NO openness, as an exercise, when all theology is an absolute and no divergence is said to exist, (if at all)? It's four-square, our way or, no way?
Wouldn't expect us, preachers, to explain the wider context of theology and ways to meet, eh? Get the bigger, picture. Be near-total absence and mention the deep and difficult, stuff.
Much like the TV/Rags etc., and alternative perspectives held by them... heretics on YouTube. Not for me to care, and debate Christians, what grieves, is the pretend and scardy-ness of the ones who do run-a-way. Very, JW and other closed shops. The Left/loon end, ...same goes. Insecurity becomes pretending, there's nout to engage with differences and discuss. Unless it's intellectual boxing matches and earnest scuffles. The name-calling, school playtime, behavior are where we're at when having a public ding-dong.
Experience and history are important to the discoveries of truth we make. That is if we know God and believe in personal growth, and/or theology accepts a degree of 'progressive revelation'. For these schools of theology, it's a no-no for Calvinists/Reformed Ch.
Block Two; The (John)Wesley/ian stand, share in block one's teaching, yet departs and allows for the 'progressive'. Third: Open Theism. With Process Theology a debatable inclusion in a broad, evangelical, sweep.
Critical Thinker's theology is fine with me, in it, ...isn't, at all, unusual, while sad to conclude, the terrain of the likes, tend to scamper off or get shirty/ 'ghost ya' and drop, contact? An atmosphere where nothing/ no one, serious, is for talking. With anyone, outside the fold. Leadership-led desires, a waste of time, and not encouraged.
Not spitting to bitch, except in the inquiries of an outside-all-flocks, viewers. The reliable and intelligent route is when theology and discernment, come out of informed consent.
On that, will leave Crit. T. and go-write a note. (Better had), pray his attitude in Trutherville, extends across all sincere and the orthodox ballpark.
To write more and get precise? Would be an instance to contact and write whatever else to 'CT' in privacy.
I tell it true: Tucker Carlson is truly great, he is just a tad bit slow on the uptake. Or maybe Andrew Anglin is simply an expertly fast uptaker.
Regardless of the state of the neurological uptake systems at work here, the fact is that eventually, Tucker eventually gets to the point.
Tucker has someone powerful behind him. You can’t stay on a major network saying the things he says without the right people behind you. The big question I have is where is all this supposed to lead? The formation of a White Power movement? Tucker eventually running for office? Is Tucker simply controlled opposition?
I OFFER THIS PIECE, NOT TO DIG INTO THE SCIENCE, BUT TO SHOW HOW STRONG THE MEDIA EFFECT IS. THIRTY-FIVE YEARS AGO, NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES WERE DRUMMING UP SUPPORT FOR A GLOBAL COOLING SCARE.
NOTICE THE LANGUAGE IN THIS APRIL 28, 1975, NEWSWEEK ARTICLE, “THE COOLING WORLD,” BY PETER GWYNNE. IT HAS THE SAME RHYTHMS TODAY'S WARMING PIECES DISPLAY, THE SAME TRANSITIONS, THE SAME RELIANCE, OF COURSE, ON EXPERTS.
IT'S ALL ABOUT INVENTING REALITY, BECAUSE THE 1975 NEWSWEEK REPORTER---OR TODAY'S HIGHLY CONFIDENT JOURNALISTS AND SMIRKING PUNDITS---HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT. THEY'RE SIMPLY TAKING THEIR CUES FROM PEOPLE THEY ACCEPT AS EXPERTS. AND THEN FABRICATING THE WHOLE BUSINESS. COOLING, WARMING---NONE OF THEM [JOURNALISTS] HAS EVER REALLY THOUGHT ABOUT THE STATE OF THE SCIENCE. NONE OF THEM HAS EVEN TURNED A LAYMAN'S MIND, ARMED WITH SOME DEGREE OF LOGIC, TO THE STATEMENTS AND METHODS OF THE CLIMATE RESEARCHERS. THEY'RE PERSONALLY CLUELESS.
From the beginning Covid has been a conspiracy against health and life. Covid is a profit-making agenda and an agenda for increasing arbitrary government power over people. There should be massive law suits and massive arrests of those who block effective Covid cures and impose a deadly vaccine.” – Paul Craig Roberts, Former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Ronald Reagan
The Spike Protein is a “uniquely dangerous” transmembrane fusion protein that is an integral part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. “The S protein plays a crucial role in penetrating host cells and initiating infection.” It also damages the cells in the lining of the blood vessel walls which leads to blood clots, bleeding, massive inflammation and death.
"Rural people will be the ones to rebuild when the cities fail."
I enjoyed the pictures.
But, the idea that farm folk are going to save or rebuild the society is a variation on the Romantic theme of getting back close to nature and celebration of the individual.
You substitute farms for nature.
But in either case the fundamental flaw in such thinking is the failure to recognize that cities and urban (to include what we call sub-urban) people have come to be the essence and definitive characteristic of ‘civilization’. And, group behavior as opposed to individual behavior is the dominate behavioral form of urban civilization.
Instead of fanaticizing about going back to the good old Norman Rockwell days; urban people have to deal with the guy robbing the store not run away from him (metaphorically speaking).
This is not to imply ‘deal with’ violently a la the Proud Boys. Rather politically. The majority of people in society abhor the behavior representative by the fellow on the bike in the store. But, this type of behavior is new and came on suddenly.
There has not be enough time for a coalescence of a political force to bring that behavior under control. The Trump phenomenon was the first nationwide coalescing. Challenges to city governments and school boards are becoming more common.
I’m old enough to remember the ‘Popeye’ cartoons were in the plot was Popeye getting beat up until he 'could stands all he could stands and can’t stands no more,’ he ate a can of spinach and crushed his adversary.
The masses are to my mind approaching the "stands all they can stands and can’t stands no more”.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m not a star-eyed optimist. On the contrary. The whole of Western Civilization has been de facto conquered by a profoundly powerful dominant ethnic minority group.
The world historian Toynbee describes empirically (factually), not philosophically, the demise of all prior civilizations at the hands of “dominant self-serving minorities”. We may be witnessing such a demise at the hands of the contemporary dominant Western minority.
But, as they say in ninth inning baseball: “it ain’t over until it’s over and it ain’t over yet!
That dominant ethnic minority may yet be “brought to heel”.